This site is only credible if it is willing to say this too: for some people, funeral expense insurance is not necessary. The question comes down to three conditions – if you can answer a calm yes to all three, your savings are an adequate answer.
- The first condition is the amount: does your savings cover the real, present-day cost of the farewell you have planned – with a margin?
- The second is separation: does the amount stay distinct from everyday spending, and will it still be there if life gets in the way?
- The third is access: will the family be able to reach it in time – this is where it most often falls down.
First condition: the amount
The benchmark is not some general figure, but your own plan: a budget built up from the cost factors of the farewell you want, calculated at today's prices – with a reasonable margin, because prices rise. If your savings cover this comfortably, the first yes is in place. It is worth reviewing this every year: what was enough last year may already be tighter this year.
Second condition: separation
"We have savings" and "we have money set aside for this purpose" are two different statements. Money living in the shared household pot is exposed to life: renovations, a car, helping out a grandchild – and the purpose can end up uncovered without anyone noticing. For a yes here, the amount needs to carry a label: in a separate account, in separate savings, with the family's knowledge. If that is the case, the second yes is in place too.
Third condition: access
This is where it most often falls down: the family typically cannot access money in the deceased's own account right away – the bank account article explains why in detail. A yes here requires access that is properly arranged: a joint account with the surviving spouse, a bank's death-benefit instruction, or the amount held by a family member who will certainly take care of it. If the money exists in principle but would in practice be out of reach for weeks or months, the third condition is not met.
The outcome – whichever it turns out to be
Three yeses: savings are an adequate answer – in that case, my job is simply to say so, and at most to help with the other elements of being organised (beneficiary designations, the folder, informing the family). If one of the conditions is shaky: you do not need insurance right away – it is worth first putting that condition itself in order (separation, access), and only deciding afterwards. A combination of the two can also be a good path: a smaller policy for the certain core, savings for the rest. The decision is yours – the test has simply given you clear criteria for making it.
Have a question about your own situation? Let’s talk it through, calmly – 20 minutes, free of charge →
